European Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases 2022; 11(2) July-December: 55-62


NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH SCUBA DIVING (WITH AN EMPHASIS ON TAU PROTEIN)

A. Williams1*

School of Medicine and Health Sciences,
Department of Psychological, Humanistic and Territorial Sciences,
Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio”, Chieti, Italy

 *Correspondence to:

e-mail: alisonjayne.williams@studenti.unich.it

 

Received: — 10 September 2022
Accepted: — 23 October 2022
 
2279-5855 (2022)
Copyright © by BIOLIFEThis publication and/or article is for individual use only and may not be furtherreproduced without written permission from the copyright holder. Unauthorized reproduction may result in financial and other penalties. Disclosure: all authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

 

ABSTRACT

 

                Scuba diving is practised as a recreational sport and for commercial and military purposes. Divers breathe gas mixtures at partial pressure and are subjected to stress from the hyperbaric environment. Decompression illness (DCI) is a severe risk to divers and can affect the nervous system. Cerebral white matter (WM) lesions and cognitive impairment have been identified in divers, and although some cases are linked with DCI, others showed no apparent connection. It has been proposed that diving may have negative neurological consequences regardless of the history of DCI, but studies have been inconclusive and hard to interpret. Further research is needed, and blood tau protein levels could be a promising tool to assess neuronal stress associated with diving to determine the long-term neurologic consequences of scuba diving.

 

Keywords: scuba, diving, decompression, neurological, brain, lesions, cognitive, DCI, DCS, AGE

  

INTRODUCTION

 

 Scuba diving is practised by commercial divers, military members, professionals, and recreational sports divers worldwide. Every year in the United States alone, approximately 3 million people practice diving recreationally, and the sport is gaining in popularity (1). Divers breathe a mix of gases at partial pressure and are subjected to changes in hydrostatic and atmospheric pressure that is exerted on the body as they descend and ascend.

There are certainly benefits for those who practice diving, such as the physical activity, social interaction, and stress reduction it can provide, as well as the opportunity to immerse in nature and open blue waters (2). However, the human body is very sensitive to changes in ambient pressure, with hyperbaric conditions producing pulmonary, circulatory, and cardiac changes during the compression and decompression stages of immersion in water. There are also serious risks, and apart from drowning, cold temperatures, and possible equipment failure, physiological changes can lead to complications such as oxygen toxicity, nitrogen narcosis, barotrauma to the lungs and sinuses, and decompression illness (DCI).

DCI can affect the nervous system, and some studies have indicated that diving, even in the case of undocumented DCI, may cause alterations to cerebral white matter (WM) and affect cognitive functions. However, results have been conflicting and hard to interpret, with some showing CNS lesions without a clear cause. Currently, no definite consensus has been reached, and further research is necessary to validate the investigations presented.

This review will look at the correlation between neurological complications and cerebral damage that have been presented thus far and the importance this may have for the long-term health outcome of those who partake in scuba diving.

Decompression illness

DCI is caused by the formation of intravascular or extravascular gas bubbles resulting from decompression. This term encompasses both decompression sickness (DCS) and arterial gas embolism (AGE), the two main decompression pathologies that afflict scuba divers (3). Bubbles cause both DCS and AGE; In DCS, gas bubbles are formed in venous blood and tissue, and in AGE, the bubbles enter the arterial circulation. Each causes damage to the particular afflicted tissue through different mechanisms (4). DCS tends to have a delayed onset and progressively worsen after the dive, whereas AGE’s is sudden (5).

Scuba divers breathe a mixture of gases that include oxygen, nitrogen, and sometimes helium. During descent, the increase in ambient pressure causes nitrogen to become dissolved in bodily fluids and tissues. The amount of nitrogen bubbles accumulated depends on the bottom time (time at reached depth) and the level of depth, in addition to numerous individual factors of variability. During ascent, the change from a high to a lower-pressure environment draws the dissolved inert nitrogen out of these fluids and tissues. A slow, controlled ascent can allow nitrogen to be eliminated safely, but a critical amount of build-up with an uncontrolled or rapid ascent can cause it to revert to a gas and form bubbles in the blood or tissues, causing DCS (6). DCS is a multisystem disorder; symptoms can vary greatly, ranging from harmless joint pains to serious complications such as cerebral gas embolism and death (7).

The extent of bubble formation, the gas load, predicts the severity of DCS, which can be classified into two types. Type I DCS, the milder form, involves the musculoskeletal system and skin, causing joint and limb pain and rashes or itching (8). Type II DCS, the serious form, involves the central nervous system (CNS), and the thoracic-level spinal cord is commonly affected. Although the spinal cord can be affected by Type II DCS, it is rare to have a cerebral injury in addition to a spinal cord injury (9). Although rare, cerebral DCI is very serious and life-threatening (10). Nitrogen is far more soluble in fat when compared to blood. It is five times more soluble in lipids and adipose tissue, and fat will act as a nitrogen reservoir, suggesting that obesity could be a risk factor for DCS (11). The WM of the spinal cord is particularly sensitive as nitrogen is highly soluble in myelin (9).

AGE occurs when bubbles enter the arterial circulation, possibly due to an overexpansion injury such as pulmonary barotrauma, which can result in emboli in distal arterioles and cause tissue or organ damage (12). Usually, the lungs can filter small bubbles in the venous system, which are unnoticeable. However, pulmonary barotrauma can be caused by breath-holding during ascent, uncontrolled ascent, or by lung diseases such as asthma or bronchitis, and leads to hyper lung expansion, which allows gas bubbles to enter directly into the bloodstream (13).

The brain is predominantly affected by arterial bubbles, as it receives a large proportion of blood flow (5)(14). If gas bubbles are arterialized into the brain, it can cause stroke-like symptoms and a transient embolism, and the diver will typically lose consciousness within 10 minutes of surfacing. Embolisms will occur in multiple areas, with different lesions causing crossed neurological deficits. Neurological symptoms can appear minor, such as tingling or numbness, motor weakness, difficulty in thinking, paralysis, sensory loss, visual disturbances, and convulsions (14).

“Right-to-left” cardiac or pulmonary shunts could allow otherwise asymptomatic vascular gas bubbles to enter the arterial circulation and cause AGE. An increased risk has been associated with the presence and size of patent foramen ovale (PFO) of the heart, which acts as a “right-to-left” shunt where bubbles can cross into arterial circulation (15)(16).

An AGE in the brain stem causes blood pressure to increase and dilatation of cerebral arterioles, leading to cerebrovascular autoregulation, cardiac arrhythmias, and possibly cardiac arrest and respiratory depression (13). In addition, immediate death can result if the gas bubbles in the brain stem are large enough to block blood flow (13).

Both DCS and AGE, enveloped within the term DCI, follow the same course of treatment. Mild symptoms after diving may be ignored or attributed to other causes initially, but treatment must be initiated as soon as possible to improve the likelihood of a good outcome (14). The first course is breathing 100% oxygen by mask, followed by recompression with hyperbaric therapy (5). Treatment has high success rates, although serious cases require more recompression sessions, and there can be residual deficits and brain damage (3).

Proper dive safety procedures have been implemented to control the slow release of N during the ascent phase to minimize the risk of DCS (17), but apart from accidents and failure to adhere to protocol, numerous individual factors are risks for the development of DCS. Some potential risk factors include alcohol consumption, dehydration, overexertion, obesity, injury and fatigue, thermal stress, performing multiple ascents, consecutive dives and days of diving (13).

 

CNS involvement in decompression illness

DCS includes symptoms ranging from mild to severe, but neurological symptoms are well-documented and considered the hallmark of serious cases (9, 18). Neurological symptoms usually appear one hour after resurfacing and may include confusion, difficulty in concentration and coordination, paresthesia and dysesthesia, lethargy, vertigo, motor weakness, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and paralysis (8, 19). In addition, entrapped vascular bubbles may cause cellular injury, increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), cerebral oedema (20), and stroke-like symptoms (3). There is also a greater risk of neurological DCS for divers with PFO, especially if it is large (15).

Recreational divers breathe compressed air, which is commonly 79% nitrogen. In the CNS, nitrogen could be accumulated by myelin, the lipid-rich substance produced by glial cells, under hyperbaric conditions, although myelin alterations have not been studied in divers yet (21). Nitrogen is highly soluble in fat, and due to the high amount of blood flow to the brain and in the presence of hyperbaric conditions, the gas is carried and dissolves in the myelin sheaths of neurons, where the bubbles may cause mechanical disruption and affect the functioning of WM (21)(22).

A recent study by Coco et al. of 54 professional divers utilized Diffusion Tensor Imaging and neuropsychological testing to study the effects of diving on brain WM and cognitive abilities. Anterior WM alterations were present, as well as impaired attention and memory functions of the prefrontal cortex, suggesting that repeated dives may build up micro-lesions in the CNS, presumably affecting the myelin sheet of neurons (21).

Different theories have been proposed to explain how bubbles damage the CNS. Arterial occlusion, venous infarction, and in situ nitrogen toxicity have been proposed as the cause. The presence of cerebral lesions from AGE similar to those of stroke, the fact that cerebral blood flow can be obstructed by bubbles, the higher risk of DCI in those with a PFO, and hypoperfused areas identified by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) give support for damage by arterial occlusion (10, 23, 24). Microvascular damage may progress over time by “silent embolism” when inert gas bubbles cause slight damage that can accumulate with repeated dives. The “silent” bubbles could cause subclinical cerebral vasculopathy without the presence of DCI and lead to some unexplained findings in some studies (25). Venous infarction may also be a cause and has been supported by different radiologic and histopathologic findings (26-28). Furthermore, the theory regarding in situ nitrogen toxicity claims that bubbles can alter nerve conduction and be toxic to neurons, leading to cytotoxic oedema and cell death (29); however, these mechanisms appear to be interlaced in patients, and the complexity of neurological DCI has yet to be elucidated.

 

Cognitive impairment and white matter damage

Numerous studies have been conducted to identify the neurological effects of diving. Neuropsychological and neurobehavioral tests, electroencephalograms (EEGs), and SPECT scans have been used in studies to determine the neurological function and extent of effects, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to assess areas where WM damage has occurred.

It has been seen that DCI can lead to nervous system damage, which could have possible long-term neurologic effects. One study by Bast-Pettersen et al. found no long-term neuropsychological effects in recreational divers after a 12-year follow-up, but impaired memory and neuropsychiatric symptoms were shown to affect divers who had a history of DCI (30). EEG has also shown abnormalities in the temporal regions of commercial saturation divers, which was exacerbated by a history of DCI (31). However, another study by Murrison et al. found no abnormalities in EEG in divers who had experienced DCI and no evidence to support brain involvement (32).

The presence of a PFO, especially a large one, is a risk factor in diving, as it has been linked to higher rates of DCI and brain lesions (33), likely caused by an AGE that enters the arterial circulation through the PFO. A study by Reul et al. found a high percentage of brain lesions, and multiple lesions came from a subgroup of 27% of studied divers, which could suggest the involvement of the PFO, which is present in 10-30% of the general population (34). Knauth et al. were able to link multiple brain lesions with the presence of a large PFO, despite the absence of DCI (33). Still, another study by Balestra et al. showed that divers with PFO showed no greater prevalence of WM lesions when compared to non-PFO divers (16).

However, most dives are asymptomatic, meaning that DCI does not occur, and it is still unclear how the act of asymptomatic diving itself could affect the nervous system in the long term, as studies have shown mixed results. In addition, MRI and EEG have provided conflicting results, and it could be that these methods are not sufficiently sensitive to detect cerebral changes associated with diving (35).

Studies have shown negative effects in asymptomatic diving (21, 25, 36-43). For example, a study of 113 military divers by Erdem et al. investigated the prevalence of lesions in divers with similar parameters (blood pressure, smoking, alcohol consumption, history of head trauma or migraine) against a non-diving control group. They found a higher incidence of cerebral WM lesions, which was not affected by age or dive history (39). In addition, an MRI study by Gempp et al. on military divers showed a higher prevalence of brain hyperintense spots and WM changes in divers compared to a control group, especially in divers with right-to-left shunting (40).

Very deep dives, usually performed by commercial saturation divers, could exacerbate the damage, and repeated deep diving can have more severe effects (41, 42). Extreme conditions may influence long-term effects, the number of dives, and deep depth (38, 44-46). While engaging in dives to depths of 50 meters or more, during the compression phase bottom time, and immediately after resurfacing, neurological and neurophysiologic effects have been shown in divers (43).

Some studies have shown a correlation between impaired cognitive function and a higher number of dives (21, 25). For example, Coco et al. found that WM alterations and mild associated cognitive impairment increased with a high number of dives, independent of the age of divers when compared to a non-diving control group (21). In contrast to these studies, others have shown little neurologic effects associated with asymptomatic diving (47-50).

An experimental rodent study investigated the effects of severe decompression on the brain, such as that experienced by commercial saturation divers. It was seen that there were circulatory changes in the brain during the acute phase of decompression, but a structural or cellular injury to brain tissue was not present, even after 2 weeks of follow-up (47). Furthermore, a 2000 study with MRI showed no differences in WM damage between a group of experienced elderly divers and a control group of non-divers (48). Another study of the same year by Cordes et al. found no abnormal neurologic findings with neuro psychometric test results and no increased prevalence of cerebral lesions in military divers (49). Finally, interesting research by Hemelryck et al. compared the cognitive functioning of scuba divers with a healthy control group as well as to professional boxers, who are at high risk of brain damage. The divers showed memory deficits when compared to the control group, but performed much better than the boxers, who had the lowest results and showed the most cognitive function deficiency (50).

In summary, as to the relationship of diving having negative long-term effects on the brain, affecting cognitive function, and causing lesions, studies until now have provided conflicting results and have so far been inconclusive.

               

Tau protein

Some recent research to determine the harmful effects of the hyperbaric environment on the CNS has begun to focus on tau protein levels, as tau may be an indicator of neuronal stress in diving.

Breathing partial pressures of oxygen and nitrogen at depth could increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and oxidative stress, which could cause neuronal damage (51), and could be observed by biochemical markers such as tau.

Tau protein is a microtubule-associated protein (MAP) found in the neurons of the CNS, and their dysfunction, and successive formation of neurofibrillary tangles, is linked to different neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (52). It can be released after axonal damage and increased neuronal activity in response to stress. Increased tau levels in the blood have also been seen in association with traumatic brain injuries (53) and in contact sports where concussions are common, such as boxing (54)(55). High intensity interval training and breath-hold diving have been seen to raise tau levels after activity (56)(57), and tau seems to be unrelated to DCI (58), which could prove useful for focusing on CNS damage inflicted by the act of diving itself.

Studies by Rosén et al have found increased blood tau protein levels after diving, with no identified correlation between absolute tau concentrations and venous gas loads in divers. A small, 2019 pilot study of 10 divers, who performed repeated deep dives between 52 and 90 meters over four days, found serum tau concentration was increased after diving by 2.5 times (59). In another recent study, Rosén et al measured the blood tau levels of 32 divers in a water-filled hyperbaric chamber, for a time of 10 minutes, to simulate a dive pressurized to 42 meters. Blood was sampled from the divers before diving and two intervals afterwards at 35-40 and 120 minutes. Tau levels were seen to increase after diving at the 35-40 min, and were further increased at 120 min, and the study was repeated with uniform results (60).

Future research using blood biomarkers such as tau could be useful for investigating neuronal damage from scuba diving.

 Significance

Scuba diving is a relatively new activity and has been growing in popularity as a recreational sport. Because of this, the long-term effects of continuous diving are now being investigated and, considering the growing number of people who are participating in diving globally and the aging population of divers, it is becoming increasingly important to determine the neurological health effects that may be associated with it.

As discussed, studies have provided conflicting results, with some showing the potential neurologic damage that could be incurred by diving and others being unconclusive. Some have shown that cognitive impairment and WM lesions have been linked to diving in people with a history of DCI and even in those without. It may be possible that the higher prevalence of cerebral lesions seen in some studies of divers without a history of DCI could be due to cumulative, subclinical injury to the neurological system caused by inert nitrogen gas bubbles during diving (39).

WM lesions are a common characteristic seen by MRI in adults (61), especially in the aging brain, with 90% prevalence in people 65 years of age and older (62). Lesions have been associated with dementia, depression, Alzheimer’s Disease, and cognitive decline (63-65). They may be non-specific, but sources of lesions are many, and can include vascular diseases, untreated chronic hypertension, migraine, inflammatory disorders, infectious diseases, alcohol abuse, metabolic disorders, and traumatic brain injuries, amongst others. Just because lesions are revealed in divers by MRI does not mean they are the direct consequence of diving.

And the presence of brain lesions does not correlate directly with reduced cognitive functioning, although it has been shown there may be a relationship in some studies. More research combining MRI and neuropsychological testing is needed to define the relationship of these brain lesions to neurologic performance.

Causation and correlation must be established in further studies by limiting for the various independent factors and methodological consistency. Numerous independent factors can interfere with results, including age, the presence of a PFO, prior head injuries and brain damage, and cardiovascular diseases including high cholesterol and hypertension.

Many studies conducted as to date have methodological flaws and biases, which could explain the inconclusive results between similar studies. Selection biases, varying degrees of age, of diving experience, and number of dives, and insufficient detection sensitivity of MRI are all factors that could be responsible for the conflicting results from studies (16). Furthermore, these studies are methodologically diverse, each reaching an independent conclusion instead of a collective result. Finally, psychometric function testing should be correlated to imaging-detected cerebral points of interest for verification (16).

Tau protein levels may be a useful tool for indicating neuronal stress caused by diving, and research should be continued to provide further insight. More studies are needed to elaborate the correlation of WM damage with diving, establish the causation, and determine the significance of lesions for the long-term neurological health outcome of divers.

CONCLUSION

The commercialization of diving has led to high safety standards and diving today is considered relatively safe when safety protocol is followed (66). However, DCI is a great risk for divers, even when depth and time regulations are followed, due to accidents, rapid ascent, and a high variability of independent factors that are associated with its occurrence. DCS and AGE can have serious health consequences for divers, but the risk can be minimized by attentively following safety protocol.

 Studies on the possible neurological effects related to diving have been conflicting, with some showing WM lesions and cognitive impairment in divers, and others showing no evidence of this. Overall, the causation of such research cannot be clearly related to diving, as those studies regarding the neurological consequences of diving have not yet been able to prove a direct correlation between cerebral damage and asymptomatic diving. Numerous variables must be accounted for to determine the underlying cause of WM damage and related cognitive deficits. Further research is needed to clarify the long-term, cumulative neurological effects that could be caused by the act of diving. Biochemical markers of neuronal damage, such as tau protein, could be useful for assessing increased neuronal activity in response to stress.

Deep diving and diving in severe conditions causes a high level of decompression stress on the body and carries a higher risk of DCI, and it could also be true that this carries a higher risk for long-term health outcome, as some studies have shown possible neurological effects. Therefore, DCI should remain the biggest concern and divers should aim to practice their sport in a conscientious and prudent manner to avoid the occurrence of DCS and AGE.

 

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

I thank Massimo Lachi (Advanced Instructor HSA/NADD, President of Lucky Sub Diving Association, Pescara, Italy) for the useful discussion and support.

 

REFERENCES

 

  1. 1. (SFIA) Sports and Fitness Industry Association. Participation in Recreational Diving Report. Silver Spring, MD.: Sports and Fitness Industry Association. 2015.
  2. Carreño A, Gascon M, Vert C, Lloret J. The Beneficial Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Scuba Diving on Human Mental Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(19):7238. doi:10.3390/ijerph17197238
  3. Vann RD, Butler FK, Mitchell SJ, Moon RE. Decompression illness. The Lancet. 2011;377(9760):153-164. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61085-9
  4. Bosco G, Rizzato A, Moon RE, Camporesi EM. Environmental Physiology and Diving Medicine. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00072
  5. Gorman DF. Arterial gas embolism as a consequence of pulmonary barotrauma. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, European Underwater Biological Society. 1984:348-368.
  6. Moon RE, Vann RD, Bennett PB. The Physiology of Decompression Illness. Scientific American. 1995;273(2):70-77. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0895-70
  7. Stephensen JC. Pathophysiology, Treatment and Aeromedical Retrieval of SCUBA – Related DCI. Journal of Military and Veterans’ Health. 2009;17(3):10-19.
  8. Hawes J, Massey EW. Neurologic Injuries from Scuba Diving. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2009;20(1):263-272. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2008.10.018
  9. Jallul S, Osman A, El-Masry W. Cerebro-spinal decompression sickness: report of two cases. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(1):116-120. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101923
  10. Kamtchum Tatuene J, Pignel R, Pollak P, Lovblad KO, Kleinschmidt A, Vargas MI. Neuroimaging of Diving-Related Decompression Illness: Current Knowledge and Perspectives. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014;35(11):2039-2044. doi:10.3174/ajnr.a4005
  11. Gabler-Smith MK, Westgate AJ, Koopman HN. Microvessel density, lipid chemistry and N2 solubility in human and pig adipose tissue. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine. 2020;47(1):1-12. doi:10.22462/01.03.2020.1
  12. Kemper T, Rienks R, van Ooij P, van Hulst R. Cutis marmorata in decompression illness may be cerebrally mediated: a novel hypothesis on the aetiology of cutis marmorata. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015;45(2):84-88.
  13. Gorman DF. Decompression Sickness and Arterial Gas Embolism in Sports Scuba Divers. Sports Medicine. 1989;8(1):32-42. doi:10.2165/00007256-198908010-00004
  14. Thalmann E. Decompression Illness. Divers Alert Network. https://dan.org/health-medicine/health-resources/diseases-conditions/decompression-illness-what-is-it-and-what-is-the-treatment
  15. Denoble P, Holm J. Guidelines for Patent Foramen Ovale and Fitness. Proceedings Summary | DAN/UHMS PFO and Fitness to Dive Workshop. DAN.org.
  16. Balestra C, Germonpré P. Correlation between Patent Foramen Ovale, Cerebral “Lesions” and Neuropsychometric Testing in Experienced Sports Divers: Does Diving Damage the Brain?. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:696. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00696
  17. Howle LE, Weber PW, Hada EA, Vann RD, Denoble PJ. The probability and severity of decompression sickness. West J, ed. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0172665. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172665
  18. Moon R, Gorman D, Treatment of the decompression disorders. In: Brubakk AO, Neuman TS (eds). Bennett and Elliott’s Physiology and Medicine of Diving. 5th ed. (Bennett PB, Elliott DH, Brubakk AO, eds.). Saunders; 2007:600-651.
  19. Newton H, Padilla W, Burkart J, Pearl D. Neurological manifestations of decompression illness in recreational divers – the Cozumel experience. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2007;34(5):349-357.
  20. Hjelde A, Nossum V, Steinsvik M, Bagstevold JI, Brubakk AO. Evaluation of cerebral gas retention and oedema formation in decompressed rats by using a simple gravimetric method. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. 2002;62(4):263-270. doi:10.1080/003655102760145816
  21. Coco M, Buscemi A, Perciavalle V, et al. Cognitive Deficits and White Matter Alterations in Highly Trained Scuba Divers. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02376
  22. Francis T, Pezeshkpour G, Dutka A, Hallenbeck J, Flynn E. Space occupying lesions in experimental spinal cord decompression sickness may be evidence of autochthonous bubble injury. Undersea Biomedicai Research 14 (Suppl). 1987;6.
  23. Leitch D, Green R. Pulmonary barotrauma in divers and the treatment of cerebral arterial gas embolism. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986;57(10 pt 1):931-938.
  24. Koch A, Kirsch H, Reuter M, Warninghoff V, Rieckert H, Deuschl G. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) and MRI-lesions in mild neurological decompression sickness (type B-DCS/AGE). Undersea Hyperb Med. 2008;35:197-205.
  25. Kowalski J, Varn A, Röttger S, et al. Neuropsychological deficits in scuba divers: an exploratory investigation. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2011;38(3):197-204.
  26. Vollmann R, Lamperti M, Magyar M, Simbrunner J. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine in a Patient with Decompression Sickness. Clinical Neuroradiology. 2011;21(4):231-233. doi:10.1007/s00062-011-0053-x
  27. Kim RC, Smith HR, Henbest ML, Choi BH. Nonhemorrhagic venous infarction of the spinal cord. Annals of Neurology. 1984;15(4):379-385. doi:10.1002/ana.410150413
  28. Sparacia G, Banco A, Sparacia B, et al. Magnetic resonance findings in scuba diving-related spinal cord decompression sickness. Magma: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology, and Medicine. 1997;5(2):111-115. doi:10.1007/bf02592241
  29. Kei PL, Choong CT, Young T, Lee SH, Lim CCT. Decompression Sickness: MRI of the Spinal Cord. Journal of Neuroimaging. 2007;17(4):378-380. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00122.x
  30. Bast-Pettersen R, Skare Ø, Nordby KC, Skogstad M. A twelve-year longitudinal study of neuropsychological function in non-saturation professional divers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2014;88(6):669-682. doi:10.1007/s00420-014-0991-0
  31. Todnem K, Skeidsvoll H, Svihus R, et al. Electroencephalography, evoked potentials and MRI brain scans in saturation divers. An epidemiological study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1991;79(4):322-329. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90127-p
  32. Murrison AW, Glasspool E, Pethybridge RJ, Francis TJ, Sedgwick EM. Electroencephalographic study of divers with histories of neurological decompression illness. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1995;52(7):451-453. doi:10.1136/oem.52.7.451
  33. Knauth M, Ries S, Pohimann S, et al. Cohort study of multiple brain lesions in sport divers: role of a patent foramen ovale. BMJ. 1997;314(7082):701-701. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7082.701
  34. Reul J, Jung A, Thron A, Weis J, Willmes K. Central nervous system lesions and cervical disc herniations in amateur divers. The Lancet. 1995;345(8962):1403-1405. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92598-8
  35. Grønning M, Risberg J, Skeidsvoll H, et al. Electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging in neurological decompression sickness. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2005;32(6):397-402.
  36. Peters BH, Levin HS, Kelly PJ. Neurologic and psychologic manifestations of decompression illness in divers. Neurology. 1977;27(2):125-125. doi:10.1212/wnl.27.2.125
  37. Curley M, Schwartz H, Zwingelberg K. Neuropsychologic assessment of cerebral decompression sickness and gas embolism. Undersea Biomed Res. 1988;15(3):223-236.
  38. Tetzlaff K, Friege L, Hutzelmann A, Reuter M, Höll D, Leplow B. Magnetic Resonance Signal Abnormalities and Neuropsychological Deficits in Elderly Compressed-Air Divers. European Neurology. 1999;42(4):194-199. doi:10.1159/000008106
  39. Erdem I, Yildiz S, Uzun G, et al. Cerebral White-Matter Lesions in Asymptomatic Military Divers. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 2009;80(1):2-4. doi:10.3357/asem.2234.2009
  40. Gempp E, Sbardella F, Stephant E, et al. Brain MRI Signal Abnormalities and Right-to-Left Shunting in Asymptomatic Military Divers. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. 2010;81(11):1008-1012. doi:10.3357/asem.2786.2010
  41. Vaernes R, Aarli J, Kløve H, Tønjum S. Differential neuropsychological effects of diving to 350 meters. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1987;58(2):155-165.
  42. Vaernes R, Kløve H, Ellertsen B. Neuropsychologic effects of saturation diving. Undersea Biomed Res. 1989;16(3):233-251.
  43. Grønning M, Aarli JA. Neurological effects of deep diving. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2011;304(1-2):17-21. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2011.01.021
  44. Slosman D, De Ribaupierre S, Chicherio C, et al. Negative neurofunctional effects of frequency, depth and environment in recreational scuba diving: the Geneva “memory dive” study. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004;38(2):108-114. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2002.003434
  45. Taylor CL, Macdiarmid JI, Ross JA, et al. Objective neuropsychological test performance of professional divers reporting a subjective complaint of “forgetfulness or loss of concentration.” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. 2006;32(4):310-317. doi:10.5271/sjweh.1015
  46. Leplow B, Tetzlaff K, Höll D, Zeng L, Reuter M. Spatial orientation in construction divers – are there associations with diving experience? International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2001;74(3):189-198. doi:10.1007/s004200000155
  47. Havnes MB, Widerøe M, Thuen M, Torp SH, Brubakk AO, Møllerløkken A. Simulated dive in rats lead to acute changes in cerebral blood flow on MRI, but no cerebral injuries to grey or white matter. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2012;113(6):1405-1414. doi:10.1007/s00421-012-2565-8
  48. Hutzelmann A, Tetzlaff K, Reuter M, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Heller M. DOES DIVING DAMAGE THE BRAIN?: MR control study of divers’ central nervous system. Acta Radiologica. 2000;41(1):18-21. doi:10.1080/028418500127344894
  49. Cordes P, Keil R, Bartsch T, et al. Neurologic outcome of controlled compressed-air diving. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1743-1746. doi:10.1212/wnl.55.11.1743
  50. Hemelryck W, Germonpré P, Papadopoulou V, Rozloznik M, Balestra C. Long term effects of recreational SCUBA diving on higher cognitive function. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2013;24(6):928-934. doi:10.1111/sms.12100
  51. Mrakic-Sposta S, Vezzoli A, D’Alessandro F, Paganini M, Dellanoce C, Cialoni D, Bosco G. Change in Oxidative Stress Biomarkers During 30 Days in Saturation Dive: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(19):7118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197118
  52. Sinsky J, Pichlerova K, Hanes J. Tau Protein Interaction Partners and Their Roles in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Tauopathies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(17):9207. doi:10.3390/ijms22179207
  53. Walker KR, Tesco G. Molecular mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2013;5. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2013.00029
  54. Zetterberg H, Hietala MA, Jonsson M, et al. Neurochemical Aftermath of Amateur Boxing. Archives of Neurology. 2006;63(9):1277. doi:10.1001/archneur.63.9.1277
  55. Shahim P, Tegner Y, Marklund N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Neurofilament light and tau as blood biomarkers for sports-related concussion. Neurology. 2018;90(20):e1780-e1788. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005518
  56. Gren M, Shahim P, Lautner R, et al. Blood biomarkers indicate mild neuroaxonal injury and increased amyloidβproduction after transient hypoxia during breath-hold diving. Brain Injury. 2016;30(10):1226-1230. doi:10.1080/02699052.2016.1179792
  57. Di Battista AP, Moes KA, Shiu MY, et al. High-Intensity Interval Training Is Associated With Alterations in Blood Biomarkers Related to Brain Injury. Frontiers in Physiology. 2018;9. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01367
  58. Shahim P, Arnell P, Kvarnström A, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid markers of central nervous system injury in decompression illness – a case-controlled pilot study. Diving Hyperb Med. 2015;45(4):240-243.
  59. Rosén A, Oscarsson N, Kvarnström A, et al. Serum tau concentration after diving – an observational pilot study. Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal. 2019;49(2):88-95. doi:10.28920/dhm49.2.88-95
  60. Rosén A, Gennser M, Oscarsson N, et al. Protein tau concentration in blood increases after SCUBA diving: an observational study. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2022;122(4):993-1005. doi:10.1007/s00421-022-04892-9
  61. Weidauer S, Wagner M, Hattingen E. White Matter Lesions in Adults – a Differential Diagnostic Approach. RöFo – Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. 2020;192(12):1154-1173. doi:10.1055/a-1207-1006
  62. de Leeuw F-E. Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2001;70(1):9-14. doi:10.1136/jnnp.70.1.9
  63. Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MMB. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348(13):1215-1222. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa022066
  64. Barber R, Scheltens P, Gholkar A, et al. White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, vascular dementia, and normal aging. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1999;67(1):66-72. doi:10.1136/jnnp.67.1.66
  65. Debette S, Markus HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341(jul26 1):c3666-c3666. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3666
  66. Dimmock K, Cummins T. “History of scuba diving tourism,” in Scuba Diving Tourism eds Musa G, Dimmock K. Oxon;14-28.

You may also like...